In this long-form blog he explains his concept of “Experience Masterplanning” as a way of linking and integrating place branding and place making and challenges place-branders to get into meaningful conversations with place-makers in order to better understand what they can bring, together, to the creation of better places.
Linking Place and Destination Brand Strategy to Place Making
In November Malcolm Allan will be running a workshop at the forthcoming 2nd City Nation Place Conference in London on the linkages between place and destination brand strategy, place making, and ways of bringing them closer together. In this long-form blog he explains his concept of “Experience Masterplanning” as a way of linking and integrating place branding and place making and challenges place-branders to get into meaningful conversations with place-makers in order to better understand what they can bring, together, to the creation of better places.
As a practising place brand strategist with a background in town planning and real estate development I have long been interested in the contribution that place branding can make to place making. I’ve been lucky to work with a number of colleagues - architects, landscape architects, development surveyors and leasing agents, who “get” what my take on place and destination brand strategy involves.At its simplest, it can be described as strategic thinking on the improvement, development and planning of the offer and experience of a place for target audiences: the people who live and work there, the businesses and organisations who operate there and the people, businesses and investors the place wishes to attract.
More widely, it’s been my experience that many professionals working in the built environment sector either are not aware of the practice of place branding as a strategic process and discipline, or do not understand what it covers and offers, or simply think that it’s just about the design of logos for the marketing collateral of developments or attractions.
In an attempt to address this issue, I organised a workshop for the UK Academy of Urbanism in March 2015 where I and a number of built environment professionals who had worked with me on brand development projects shared our insights on the contribution of place branding to place making. You can download a video of the workshop below
During the debate at the workshop I was struck by the connections that participants were making between what the presenters said about our process of developing and planning the delivery of place brand strategy, its connection to place-making, and the shared objective of wanting to make places that work better for people. The two areas of practice are two sides of the same coin – both with key contributions to making places work better and offer better experiences.
Later that year, I led a workshop at the annual conference of the International Cities, Town Centres and Communities (ICTC) Society in Woolongong, NSW in Australia, on the subject of the “Contribution of Place Brand Strategy to the Creation of Liveable and Loveable Places”.
What struck me quite forcibly during this workshop was the belief among many of the participating built environment professionals that branding was what was done to a place once it had been created; that it was about promoting its current offer. Few had explored, or understood, what the practice of place branding (strategy) could offer the planning, improvement and development of places.
What Place Branders Need to Understand About Place-making
In order to increase shared understanding of what place branders can bring to place-making, place branders must first develop a greater appreciation of how built environment professionals think about place-making and what it involves.
Below, I offer my take on this subject with the caveat that there is a healthy, ongoing debate among built environment professions on place-making.
In my experience, place-making requires an understanding of place in a spatial sense, in a design sense, in an occupancy (human) sense, and in an attraction sense (understanding why people are there):
- Spatial: the physical components of place. Typically, this includes the size of the place; its layout and its shape; the types and mix of land uses it has; how it can be accessed; how people move around it. It means how places work (or fail to do so) in terms of their layout as well as the configurations of different types of land uses and their density and the operations of firms and organisations that occupy the spaces and buildings of the place.
- Design: the scale, shape, floor-space, utility (fit for purpose/occupancy), elevations, building materials, etc. of buildings and spaces.
- Occupancy: the people who live there; the businesses and organisations who operate there; the suppliers of facilities and services who operate there.
- Attraction: the offers and experiences that people want or need to live their lives including: housing, schools, health and welfare services, places that offer employment, leisure and entertainment services, sports services and places for congregation such as public parks and squares.
In a perceptive article by Susan Silberberg entitled “The Common Thread” in the Journal of the Royal Society for Art (Issue 3 2015 https://www.thersa.org/discover/publications-and-articles/journals/issue-3-2015) she discusses the evolution of place-making and the reasons for its current resurgence, given in more detail in her major report “Places in the Making” for the MIT Department of Urban Studies and Planning ( https://dusp.mit.edu/sites/dusp.mit.edu/files/attachments/project/mit-dusp-places-in-the-making.pdf ). She defines place-making as “the deliberate shaping of an environment to facilitate social interaction and improve a community’s quality of life”; which others, like the US Project for Public Spaces, have likened to the shaping and making of places by people for people ( http://www.pps.org/reference/what_is_placemaking/ ). She notes that different interest groups look to and champion place-making for different purposes including strategies for regenerating residential neighbourhoods and commercial districts, to attract inward investment, to make better use of public spaces for the common good, to plan facilities and services to attract and retain businesses and talented workers, and to improve the marketability of real estate developments.
So, spatial socio-economic place-making is a complex process and has many “building blocks” which place brand strategists need to understand and become familiar with to interact more creatively with place-makers and to demonstrate to them the worth of their discipline and practice.
What Built Environment Place-Makers Need to Understand About Place-Branding
In my experience of working with built environment professionals, they need to develop a better understanding of what places can offer people and how different audiences experience places in terms of those offers. Too many local authority planners and other built environmental professionals think that place branding is about marketing planned or completed developments to the target customers that property agents have identified as the desired customer market segment. By and large, many still equate place branding with logos, tag lines and marketing collateral. While this type of activity has a legitimate place in creating a unique identity for a development, place brand strategists must continually reinforce that true brand strategy amounts to far more than graphic design and marketing elements. Brand strategists must demonstrate the depth and understanding they can bring in terms of identifying what different groups or “tribes” in populations desire from places and developments.
In my experience, architects, town planners, developers and property agents rarely take sufficient time to understand the importance of understanding changes in consumer behaviour and what is driving them. If they want to develop successful places that people will choose over other options – viable developments that will attract tenants or purchasers – then they must have deep insight into how people want to use spaces and buildings; how people want to live their lives; the mix of facilities and services they want in the places they live.
Place brand strategists bring unique expertise in identifying meaningful, relevant and realisable opportunities for places. We can identify how places might offer people a higher quality of life; how places might adapt to accommodate emerging changes in peoples’ life styles; how spaces and buildings might provide more relevant mix of services to address changing needs.
In short, place branding can help built-environment professionals design places that are the best match between what people want and what the place provides. Our task is to demonstrate how smart brand strategies can turn spatial and building plans into more successful places. The right brand approach will help retain and attract the right kind of residents, businesses, investors and visitors by offering them the options, facilities and services that make it “their kind of place” to live, work, study or visit.
This is what my workshop this November at City Nation Place will focus on what I term “Experience Masterplanning”, a process that informs Spatial Masterplanning.
Experience masterplanning is about planning and delivering the desired actions, offers and experiences that will bring a place brand strategy to life. It means populating spatial and economic planning with an understanding of consumers’ needs, wants and desires. All too often spatial masterplans do not take changes in consumer behaviours into account and economic development rarely devotes sufficient attention to consumer behaviour.
My initial work on the development of this concept, a paper given at the 2012 Bi-Annual Place Branding and Marketing Conference in Cardiff in 2012, can be downloaded at http://www.placematters.co/pdf/PM_ER_ExperienceMasterplanningPaper_05.12.12.pdf
My motivation for developing the concept was simple. Having helped clients to develop brand strategies to improve the offer of their place, make them more attractive and to stand out from their competition, their next challenge was to transform strategy into reality.The key is developing detailed plans for funding, scheduling and delivering improved or new brand assets; identifying who is best placed to fund and deliver them; and which specific developers, providers and operators of these assets to attract to their place.
Given that so many spatial planning strategies take many years to effect, the objective of experience masterplanning is to turn the place brand strategy into early “wins” that people can see are changing the offer of the place in meaningful ways and helping to differentiate a destination from its competitors.
Experience masterplanning is a people-centric way of:
- Connecting place brand vision and strategy to spatial planning to ensure that the promised experience can be delivered and is economically viable;
- Guiding place-based spatial change to ensure that the experience of the place and the brand promise are aligned and that it can operate and be managed effectively;
- Taking “on-brand” actions that deliver the brand promise and exemplify the brand in action – giving priority (and planning permission) to proposals that truly exemplify the brand offer and not supporting those that are “off-brand”; using the plan as a means of selecting and choosing the most appropriate investments and projects to deliver the brand promise and rejecting those that may undermine the brand;
- Identifying what (activities/services/events) should happen in the physical spaces available, and the spaces between them – activities that “consumers” want to undertake or be involved in;
- Informing three-dimensional design to ensure that designs for spaces and buildings to house new and improved offers and experiences are fit for purpose and the needs of consumers as well as occupiers.
Many kinds of experience can be addressed in implementing a place brand strategy. Attention needs to be given to the experiences that the brand promises for people who live and work in the place, for employers running businesses there, for people visiting it, and for prospective inward investors. These can include:
- Learning and training environments – modern learning hubs and university quarters;
- Informal spaces between buildings and formal public places and the range of things people can do and see there;
- The location and nature of streets, roads, walkways and footpaths – the facilities and services located on them and the things that will happen along them;
- City and town centres – their offers and facilities, their gathering places and the activities and events that they host;
- Indoor and outdoor centres – retail, leisure, entertainment and sports places;
- Events – formal and informal that are an integral part of the offer;
- Services – such as policing, street cleansing, street and place lighting, provision of water for water features;
- Transportation – points of access to places and their attractions and the provision of bus, tram and train routes, and clear signage to enable connectivity.
Experience Masterplanning can be undertaken for a variety of types of places:
- New settlements – new residential areas on former brownfield land or on greenfield land
- City and town centres undergoing renewal and regeneration
- High Streets/main streets being improved
- Commercial office centres being upgraded or rebuilt
- Public places – square, parks, gardens
- Sports and entertainment complexes – in and out of town
- Cultural and heritage quarters
- Transportation hubs that are more than just stations – St Pancras station in London for example
- Events - festivals – music, writing, art, food, sports, etc.
- Resorts and holiday villages
Experience Masterplanning can be undertaken for almost anywhere that wants to attract or retain an audience and deliver on a promised brand offer and experience.
There are a number of specific challenges that need to be recognised and addressed when undertaking experience masterplanning, such as:
- Clarifying the future defining offer(s) of the place – its assets, attractors, infrastructure, services, events – the ones that mark it out and distinguish it from other places;
- Clarifying the future types of experiences that the place wishes to provide and for whom – its consumer market place - residents, workers, learners, visitors, employers and investors;
- Understanding the place’s ambition for new offers and experiences - attractors, infrastructure, services, events – and who the offers are aimed at;
- Planning the linkages between the offers and how they can effectively be grouped together – spatially and as packages of activities;
- Assessing the risks and appraising the costs of developing new offers – attractors, infrastructure, services and events;
- Identifying and generating investment for improvement and development of the offer and calculating the potential scale of returns;
- Involving communities, investors and operators in the planning process and managing and coordinating the implementation of the many elements of the plan;
- Managing the on-going planning process;
- Monitoring and evaluating the impact of the plan based on agreed targets and key performance indicators (KPI’s).
A Recent Example
A good example of a “hybrid” area plan that combines spatial planning and experience planning is the recently published Plan for London Bridge prepared by Team London Bridge (the BID for the area) and local stakeholders, whose origin is, in large part, based on the place brand identity strategy prepared for the area in 2013/14, which can be accessed at http://www.teamlondonbridge.co.uk/gfx/uploads/pres_11022016120850.pdf
A photo from the consultation process along with a CGI of a finished project.
Two extracts from the Plan for London Bridge report - Download the full report
Action to Bring Place-Branding and Place-Making Closer
For place and destination brand strategy to be recognised and valued as making a key and meaningful contribution to place making, its practitioners and advocates need to more actively engage with built environment professionals to find creative, meaningful and effective ways of working together to share their expertise and practice in order to make placesmore appealing and relevant to those who live, work and learn there. City Nation Place as an organisation is well placed to foster and encourage this collaboration.
As the space available in this blog post is limited,Malcolm Allan is developing a longer paper on this topic (an update of his 2012 version) which will be available from the Placematters web site after the November 2016 City Nation Place conference, most likely in January 2017.
Place brand practitioners interested in learning more about place making might start with the following publications and organisations;
•“Places in the Making” - MIT Department of Urban Studies and Planning https://dusp.mit.edu/sites/dusp.mit.edu/files/attachments/project/mit-dusp-places-in-the-making.pdf
•“Good Cities – Better Lives: How Europe Discovered the Lost Art of Urbanism”, Peter Hall and Nicholas Falk, Routledge, 2014
•“What is Placemaking”, the Project for Public Places http://www.pps.org/reference/what_is_placemaking/
Malcolm Allan is the founder of Placematters, a place and destination brand strategy consultancy, currently working on a mix of national, city and regeneration area brand strategies in the UK, Europe, North and South America. He is an Academician of the UK Academy of Urbanism and a member of the Advisory Council of the US Project for Public Places.